erynn

Erynn Rowan Laurie is a disabled Cold War era Navy veteran. She has been a Pagan since 1984 and interested in the esoteric arts since 1974. One of the many founders of the Celtic Reconstructionist Pagan movement, she is a poet and writer, author of Ogam: Weaving Word Wisdom and many other works.

 

From the Veterans For Peace newsletter:

Dear Veterans For Peace and Friends,

I have always found our VFP “Statement of Purpose” to be an important guiding compass for our actions. One of our goals is “to end the arms race and to reduce and eventually eliminate nuclear weapons”. It is extremely important to work on nuclear issues because the nuclear industry as a whole, its weapons, its waste and its economics are extraordinarily threatening to our well being.

Nevada Desert Experience Sacred Peace Walk
April 18th – April 25, 2011
To witness against nuclear weapons (Nevada Test Site) and drones (Creech Air Force base)
and to share in multi-faith and desert spirituality.
go to: www.vfpchapter10.org and www.nevadadesertexperience.org for complete information

A remarkable and beautiful experience, which encompasses the protest of nuclear weapons and drones and incorporates desert spirituality, spanning the major world religions along with the indigenous and pagan spirituality and the awesome beauty of the Mojave desert will begin on starting on April 18th, 2011 and end on April 25th, 2011. This is the Sacred Peace Walk, sponsored by the Nevada Desert Experience from Las Vegas, Nevada to the Nevada Test Site, a walk of approximately 63 miles. While the walk is relatively short (and everyone is invited to walk only as far as they are comfortable with and can safely accomplish) the experience along the way often is transcendent. Have you ever seen the desert in bloom? Since Easter is late this year we are likely to see a magnificent flowering and have very pleasant walking conditions.

We also realize not everyone has a full week so there will be two orientations, one on Monday, April 18th for those walkers who have the time and wish to walk the entire distance and a second orientation on Friday April 22, 2011 for those who want very much to participate but can only come for the weekend.

I have worked with Nevada Desert Experience and participated in this walk for the last several years and am constantly amazed at the depth and beauty of both the desert and the experiences provided by the activities planned on route. If you will click http://www.vfpchapter10.org I have put together a short series of pictures on VFP Chapter 10’s website so you might have a better understanding of this peace walk.

The pictures really are short and will provide a link to http://www.nevadadesertexperience.org where you can find complete information. The cost of this walk is inexpensive and also flexible too. If you want to come we will work with you to find a way. Please feel free to call me also, John Amidon at 518-312-6442. Let’s have a strong VFP presence this year at the Nevada Test Site. Thank you!
?
Sincerely,
John Amidon
VFP Chapter 10, Albany, NY

PS The nuclear industry is part of the war economy, so keeping asking “How is the War Economy Working For You?” Lets make this connection clear!

 

It’s been all over the news in the past day or so. The Pentagon’s study on DADT and the attitudes of active duty military and dependents was released with an overwhelming majority saying that open service by GLBT individuals would not hurt morale or readiness. A whopping 70% of respondents believe that DADT should be repealed, which is remarkable considering how biased the study itself was in its construction and execution.

The Los Angeles Times offers some analysis of the situation and notes that, as one might predict, Republican lawmakers like Senator John McCain (AZ) are still fighting the idea tooth and nail. I hope these dinosaurs slip away into the night so that the rest of us can soon wake to a world with slightly more equality in it.

We have been in the military all along. The only thing discriminatory policies have done is provide opportunities for pressure and blackmail against servicemembers who have been forced to hide who they are in order to serve, and to drive fully qualified individuals with critical skills out of service.

This is the time to write to your congresscritters, folks. A lame duck session can be a time of action, when outgoing legislators feel like they can do something without having to fear the opinions of the press or their constituency. Let’s use this opportunity and pressure them to do the right thing before the end of this session. It can be done. We’re so very close now.

 

I’ve seen a lot of posts around the net today on veterans, Veterans Day, and military issues. It’s always a struggle for me. As a veteran, I’d naturally like to feel at least vaguely appreciated. As a quiet peace activist, I always feel a wrench in my gut when I see over the top displays of “patriotism” and flag waving that are essentially meaningless glorifications of war. It’s hard to find balance in the public discourse. I still feel strange when people thank me for my service.

Yet all the “thank you”s in the world don’t help if you’re worried about keeping a roof over your head, worried about where your next meal will come from, or so busy trying to deal with your medical problems that nothing else can penetrate your awareness. And this, sadly, is the state of far too many veterans in this country. The Veterans Administration is deliberately difficult to negotiate, and actually acquiring compensation for disability can take years and many rejections or equally many nickel and dime offers that don’t nearly compensate for the actual damage done by your service. If you’re a woman vet, the struggle is often even harder, especially for those suffering from MST, military sexual trauma.

For those who are GLBT and on active duty, there are additional issues based on the unjust DADT law, which actively lays us open to blackmail. It’s no way to guarantee security for the mission or for individual servicemembers. Deliberately making a considerable proportion of your military vulnerable to blackmail makes no sense whatsoever. Thankfully, lame duck sessions of congress are sometimes better at pushing controversial legislation because the outgoing legislators no longer have anything to fear from their constituency — there’s no upcoming election to worry about. It’s possible that DADT might go down in the midst of all this. I remain hopeful.

As reported over on The Wild Hunt today, religious leaders and veterans are calling for a more nuanced view of conscientious objection:

In a report issued Wednesday (Nov. 10), the Truth Commission on Conscience in War called on the military to revise its rules to include “selective conscientious objection,” and urged religious leaders to address issues of conscience during wartime … The report states that current rules about conscientious objection requires an objection to “war in any form,” creating a conflict for those who may have specific moral objections to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. ”It denies freedom of religious practice and the exercise of moral conscience to those serving in the military who object to a particular war based on the moral criteria of just war, which the military itself teaches and upholds as important,” the report reads. The report notes that military rules dating to the time of the Vietnam draft leave no legal basis for objection for someone who believes “participation implicates them in an immoral war or in war crimes.

It’s important to note that even if such a thing were to become law/military regulation, there would be extreme pressure from the military to conform and to not file as a C.O. I’m certain that harassment and sanctions would be leveled against anyone courageous enough to openly and publicly object to participating in any war or military action. We see this sort of pressure and harassment applied to people who don’t necessarily object to service in an unjust war, who are simply suffering from the effects of rape or of PTSD caused by other aspects of their service. Those who seek psychiatric treatment are all too often singled out for abuse and, in many cases, this abuse has resulted in suicide.

When we enlist in the military, we open ourselves up to an incredible number of abuses and violations of our civil rights, whether we are women, Pagan, or queer. Military women are statistically more likely to be raped by a co-worker than civilian women. Queer servicemembers face discharge if they are found out. Pagans still face discrimination within the ranks and from the brass, at some commands more than others.

Veterans with PTSD and other mental health issues often find themselves homeless and unable to cope with alcoholism or other problems.

Servicemembers who are dealing with depression, PTSD, and other issues do have places to turn outside of the military system, though most aren’t aware of this. The Soldiers Project and Give an Hour are both programs that can help servicemembers and their families — in some cases even GLBT families/domestic partners/spouses — find help at low or no cost when the command fails them.

Organizations like Veterans for Peace operate coffeehouses and other places where military war resisters can go for support and help, and other resources to aid active duty and veterans with issues ranging from sexual assault to homelessness.

It takes more than a “thank you” uttered once a year to help heal lives that have been broken by military service. It takes more than a “thank you” to support those currently on active duty, risking their lives daily, or working as support troops and in non-combat positions who still have to face stresses not imaginable by most of the civilian world. There are resources, whether you are on the hawk or the dove end of the spectrum; there are people working to preserve the rights and dignity of servicemembers and veterans. Knowing where and how to look are important. I hope that this collection of links can be a helpful place to start.

 

In a deeply ironic move, an appeals court yesterday ordered the scuppering of the halt on the enforcement of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. At the same time, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton posted a video for the “It Gets Better” project. I’m still boggled by the schizophrenia of the Obama administration when it comes to this mess. That they appear to offer a message of “hope” while openly demonstrating the second-class citizenship of these same queerfolk — of individuals like myself — is the height of arrogant hypocrisy.

Yesterday, October 20th, was supposed to be a day where people wore purple to express some sort of solidarity with the queer community and to raise awareness of the suicides of queer youth. We’re telling kids “it gets better” and then demonstrating through the courts exactly how it does not. In an NPR interview with retired Lt. Col. Robert Maginnis, he states:

Actually, I tend to agree with what Secretary Gates said on the issue. And that is that you need to engage the force to find out their opinion about this because, after all, this is an all-volunteer force. If in fact they are alienated by a decision like this to repeal, then they could walk. And who are you going to backfill?

If you look demographically at who fills the armed forces today, they typically are out of the South and the mountain west. They typically are religious conservative and they also come from families with a history of military service. That’s a very, very miniscule minority in this country. You alienate the very people that make up the all-volunteer force, then Congress has a much larger problem, that is, going back to conscription.

I had no idea how many people would leave if you repeal the law, however, that’s a risk that we take if we move forward on this.

What Maginnis is saying, in essence, is that if the military allows queer people to serve openly, the bigots might leave. Horrors! Imagine a military not composed of dominionist Christian bigots. I’m sure that the Pentagon was worried about racists leaving the military when it was desegregated by Truman, as well. We would be well rid of them, as far as I’m concerned. I’m from a traditionally military family from liberal New England. I’m queer. I’m Pagan. I have no interest in preserving a bigoted military culture, regardless of the basis and focus of that bigotry. Perhaps if enlistment dropped, the administration might actually move toward getting us out of the Afghani war and remove the remainder of our troops from Iraq. Wouldn’t that be a shock to the world?

What’s happening with DADT right now? MSNBC reports:

Pentagon officials told NBC News on Thursday the military will immediately resume enforcement of the 1993 “don’t ask, don’t tell” rule. The policy says gays may serve but only if they keep secret their sexual orientation.

One senior Pentagon official told NBC News that recruiters were allowed to accept applications from gay individuals, but those who were openly gay would not be permitted to enlist.

HRC, Servicemembers United, and other civil rights organizations have been advising individuals currently in service not to come out, and this is precisely why. Until the law is struck down, the status of queer servicemembers is in limbo and under the discretionary power of the CO of the base on which they serve. A de-Christianized military would be a better place for everyone.

 

CNN reports today that a federal judge has ordered the US military to stop enforcing the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy. According to the CNN article:

U.S. District Judge Virginia Phillips’ permanent worldwide injunction — praised by gay rights organizations — orders the military “immediately to suspend and discontinue any investigation, or discharge, separation, or other proceeding, that may have been commenced” under the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy.

Judge Phillips stated that DADT “infringes the fundamental rights” of military service members and prospective service members and violates their rights to due process and freedom of speech. As reported in the Washington Post,

The injunction “was the only reasonable solution,” said Christian Berle, acting Executive director of Log Cabin Republicans. “These soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines sacrifice so much in defense of our nation and our Constitution.”

This is an immense step forward for gay, lesbian, and bisexual servicemembers and it will potentially put an end to this egregious religiously-based discrimination against non-heterosexual servicemembers that has been in place for seventeen years. The Obama administration has sixty days in which to appeal this ruling; there is a good chance this will happen. There is apparently also a bill currently before congress that would include striking down DADT after a Pentagon review is concluded in December of this year.

Should the Obama administration decline to appeal the ruling, DADT could be ended “by next week” says Aaron Belkin, director of the Palm Center, a research institute of the University of California-Santa Barbara. Despite this judicial advance, Servicemembers United, and the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network — both GLBT veterans and servicemembers organizations — urge caution about coming out immediately. If the ruling is appealed, it could still take five years or more for the regulation to be struck down.

 

In recent weeks, there has been a great deal of movement both for and against the repeal of DADT. The Senate voted down – by four votes – the military appropriations bill with the rider that would have struck down DADT, but in late September, a federal judge in Tacoma ordered a lesbian servicemember reinstated after her discharge under DADT. Some folks are suggesting that the only current way to win this is through the courts system, which is the primary way that minority rights have been won in this country, among them the right for people with different skin colors to marry.

The racial integration of the military was enacted by an Executive Order signed by President Harry S. Truman in 1948. That integration was, incidentally, just as much of a hot-button political issue in its day as GLBT individuals in service are now. Desegregation was not ultimately achieved in the Army until the Korean War, in 1951.

A news article on military.com offers some analysis of the current situation, with the Log Cabin Republicans suggesting that the use of the court system may be critical in achieving victory for our ability to serve openly. Aubrey Sarvis, executive director of Servicemembers United, says:

“The statute is in place until there is finality,” said Aubrey Sarvis, executive director of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, which over the past 17 years has represented more than 10,000 Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines faced with military expulsion because of accusations of homosexuality. “Appeals will mean they will likely be tied up in the courts for years. All eyes are on the Senate, where they should be.”

The Obama administration has expressed a preference for resolving the issue through congressional action rather than through the courts but, either way, this will be a protracted fight with incremental progress for those of us who are not heterosexual. The stranglehold of the Christian Right over the military and the Republican party will continue to be an obstacle backed by a specifically religious agenda.

I will point out that if you follow the link to the military.com article, the comments section is filled with religiously-based homophobic screeds. If you’re even remotely in favor of human rights for non-heterosexuals, it’s likely to raise your blood pressure significantly.

 

The Washington Blade announced today that Senator Harry Reid (D-Nev) intends to schedule a vote next week on defense budget legislation that will include the repeal of DADT. He will need to come up with 60 votes to kill a filibuster that will likely ensue in an attempt to stop the legislation from going through.

If you are at all concerned about this topic, now is the time to contact your Senators and let them know what this means to you. If you’re active duty or a veteran, please be sure to mention this, as it will likely carry more weight than contact from a civilian. It’s important to stay on top of this legislation. If you are on Twitter, you can follow @DADT, the feed for Servicemembers United, for up to date information.

Servicemembers Legal Defense Network is another good source for news and activism on this topic. Their Twitter feed is @FreedomToServe.

Actions are planned in DC on September 16th, this Thursday, so if you are in the area, consider getting involved. This is a fight for all of us.

 

It’s all over the news. Today the US District Court, Central District of California, ruled that the legislation known as Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell is unconstitutional. While it is possible that the Obama administration will appeal this decision, moving it to the Supreme Court, this is the second major victory for GLBT rights in recent weeks, following swiftly on the heels of the decision that laws restricting same-sex marriage are unconstitutional.

Judge Virginia A. Phillips filed her opinion today, and this 85-page ruling can be found at the link above. This is a great victory for everyone who believes in equal rights, and that religion should keep its hands out of politics. Religious bigotry is and always has been at the heart of this discriminatory policy, and it has harmed military readiness by discharging thousands of qualified, willing individuals who enlisted or who had gone through expensive officer training to serve in the US military in all its branches. This is an affirmation of the value and dignity of gay, lesbian and bisexual servicemembers and all GLBT veterans who served under the threat of discharge for simply being who and what they are.

It is possible, as I noted, that the Obama administration may attempt to appeal, but the day is coming soon when our equality is acknowledged within the military. This is a thing worth celebrating.

 

The Huffington Post, among other sources, reported recently about military personnel being forced to attend a Christian concert or face the disciplinary action of cleaning barracks buildings. This is a blatant and obvious violation of the rights of anyone who did not wish to go to an evangelical indoctrination.

Yet, this behavior is absolutely not new in the US military. Back in 1979 when I was in boot camp in the Navy, every Sunday we would be given a choice: go to one of the Sunday religious services, or stay in the barracks and scrub toilets. I was a Christian at the time, having been raised in that religion, and I wanted to avoid having to do that sort of cleanup work, so I would go to services. They had several dozen types of services to choose from, including (apparently, as I never tried to attend) both Jewish and Moslem services, but the vast majority of these “choices” were Christian. I ended up going to a different one each week, looking for a little variety.

Every night before lights out, there was a “voluntary” bible study in the barracks. It was conducted in the open barracks bay, not in a private room, so everyone was essentially forced to attend because we were supposed to be in bed even though we’d not had lights out yet. There would be a bible reading (almost always New Testament) and prayer, though no one was “required” to contribute to the conversation. As a Christian at the time, and being a whole 17 years old, I had no consciousness that what I was doing was a violation of the rights of the non-Christians in the company, and I know there were some. Under the same circumstances today, I would be appalled.

This particular action was absolutely egregious, but it is only a part of a larger pattern than has been in place for more than 30 years. It was going strong when I entered boot camp and was assumed as normative. It is an indicator of how badly we need to remove this enforcement of normative Christianity from the ranks. The fact is that people have been actively punished for not being Christian for a very long time, and that evangelical extremism was, even then, well established as the military norm.

 

Today, Servicemembers United released the responses it received from Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morell regarding its questions and concerns about the DoD survey on the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy. As expected, Morell attempted to justify biases, contradicted his previous statements, and gave a number of excuses for the Pentagon’s biased and discriminatory behaviors.

Also, as usual, both parties neglected to even mention the existence of bisexuals in the ranks, who are equally affected by discriminatory policies. I find this extremely disturbing on the part of Servicemembers United, an organization that should, quite frankly, know better. It is part of a consistent pattern in the media and among allegedly GLBT organizations to ignore and render invisible the bisexual and other non-normative folks who make up a part of the spectrum either in service or as veterans — and yes, there are transsexual veterans, make no mistake.

Nearly everything about this poll was designed to provoke a negative response, from the wording of its framing to leading choices in its multiple choice answers. Negative choices far outweigh the ability to offer positive or neutral responses to the questions. The actual action and impact of DADT is misrepresented, focusing entirely on actual or suspected activity rather than reflecting the fact that simply being falsely accused of being gay, lesbian or bisexual can get someone removed from service.

Of course, cynical and manipulative activity like this is only to be expected from the Department of Defense. I am appalled that, as usual, this blatant manipulation is at the expense of individuals who want very much to serve in the military during a time when qualified personnel are desperately needed.

All posts are the copyright of the individual authors. Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha